- 202101-BMGT490H-0101-QUEST CAPSTONE PRACTICUM - James Purtilo - Instructor Subgroup Report

202101-BMGT490H-0101-QUEST CAPSTONE PRACTICUM - James Purtilo - Instructor Subgroup Report - Spring 2021

Project Title: University of Maryland Course Evaluation Spring 2021

Number of Students Invited: 35
Number of Evaluations Submitted: 7
Response Rate: 20.0%

Report Comments This Instructor Subgroup Report presents feedback received from students for individual sections within the Report Group for QUEST CAPSTONE PRACTICUM and for the Instructor James Purtilo in that course. The Report Group is the lead section of a grouped course (i.e. large-lecture course) and/or the primary of cross-listed courses. Only course section means are provided in this report overall Report Group means are in the Instructor Report.

Semester: Spring 2021
College: Robert H. Smith School of Business
Department: BMGT-Robert H. Smith School of Business
Course #: BMGT490H
Section #: 0101
Course Title: QUEST CAPSTONE PRACTICUM
Report Group: 202101-BMGT490H-0101

Instructor: James Purtilo

Download PDF

Grade Distribution

Grade A	Grade B	Grade C	Grade D	Grade F	Grade PS	Grade W
35	0	0	0	0	0	0

Grade distribution is current as of May 26, 2021 and includes students receiving a W for the course. Some grades are not included (e.g., Cancel, Incomplete).

Administrator University-Wide Course Items Applied to All Section Instructors
Results for use by faculty/instructors and for administrative purposes.
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.

By Score

Scale is Strongly Disagree (0) to Strongly Agree (4) with a Neutral mid-point

Table for By Score.
Question	Course
Question	Mean
The course was intellectually challenging.	3.9
I learned a lot from this course.	3.9

By Frequency

1. The course was intellectually challenging.

Table for By Frequency-1. The course was intellectually challenging..
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Strongly Disagree	0	0	0.0%
Disagree	1	0	0.0%
Neutral	2	0	0.0%
Agree	3	1	14.3%
Strongly Agree	4	6	85.7%

Table for By Frequency-1. The course was intellectually challenging.-Statistics.
Statistics	Value
Response Count	7
Mean	3.9
Standard Deviation	0.4

2. I learned a lot from this course.

Table for By Frequency-2. I learned a lot from this course..
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Strongly Disagree	0	0	0.0%
Disagree	1	0	0.0%
Neutral	2	0	0.0%
Agree	3	1	14.3%
Strongly Agree	4	6	85.7%

Table for By Frequency-2. I learned a lot from this course.-Statistics.
Statistics	Value
Response Count	7
Mean	3.9
Standard Deviation	0.4

How does this course fit into your academic plan or course of study?

Table for How does this course fit into your academic plan or course of study?-How does this course fit into your academic plan or course of study?.
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
General Education or CORE Requirement	0	0	0.0%
Major/Certificate/Minor/Program Requirement	1	7	100.0%
Elective	2	0	0.0%

Additional comments (e.g. about course content/materials, teaching style, etc.):

Table for Additional comments (e.g. about course content/materials, teaching style, etc.):.

Comments

My favorite class this semester. Such a great way to end the QUEST experience.

One of the best courses I've taken in college. Taught very well and was a great experience.

Post examples earlier if possible! (or even just templates so we know what is expected)

Administrator University-Wide Instructor James Purtilo Items
Results for use by faculty/instructors and for administrative purposes.
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.

By Score

Scale is Strongly Disagree (0) to Strongly Agree (4) with a Neutral mid-point

Table for By Score.
Question	Course
Question	Mean
The instructor treated students with respect.	1.6
The instructor was well-prepared for class.	2.3
Overall, this instructor was an effective teacher.	1.7

By Frequency

1. The instructor treated students with respect.

Table for By Frequency-1. The instructor treated students with respect..
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Strongly Disagree	0	2	28.6%
Disagree	1	3	42.9%
Neutral	2	0	0.0%
Agree	3	0	0.0%
Strongly Agree	4	2	28.6%

Table for By Frequency-1. The instructor treated students with respect.-Statistics.
Statistics	Value
Response Count	7
Mean	1.6
Standard Deviation	1.7

2. The instructor was well-prepared for class.

Table for By Frequency-2. The instructor was well-prepared for class..
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Strongly Disagree	0	1	14.3%
Disagree	1	2	28.6%
Neutral	2	0	0.0%
Agree	3	2	28.6%
Strongly Agree	4	2	28.6%

Table for By Frequency-2. The instructor was well-prepared for class.-Statistics.
Statistics	Value
Response Count	7
Mean	2.3
Standard Deviation	1.6

3. Overall, this instructor was an effective teacher.

Table for By Frequency-3. Overall, this instructor was an effective teacher..
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Strongly Disagree	0	2	28.6%
Disagree	1	2	28.6%
Neutral	2	1	14.3%
Agree	3	0	0.0%
Strongly Agree	4	2	28.6%

Table for By Frequency-3. Overall, this instructor was an effective teacher.-Statistics.
Statistics	Value
Response Count	7
Mean	1.7
Standard Deviation	1.7

Overall Score

Averaging the following five scaled Administrator items (from above, repeated below) results in the Overall Score.

Scale is Strongly Disagree (0) to Strongly Agree (4) with a Neutral mid-point

Table for Overall Score-1st Scale.
Competency	Course
The course was intellectually challenging	3.9
I learned a lot from this course	3.9
The instructor treated students with respect	1.6
The instructor was well-prepared for class	2.3
Overall, this instructor was an effective teacher	1.7
Total Score	2.7

The standards the instructor James Purtilo set for students were...

By Score

Scale is Too Low (0) to Too High (2) with an Appropriate mid-point

Table for By Score.
Question	Course
Question	Mean
The standards the instructor set for students were...	1.3

By Frequency

The standards the instructor set for students were...

Table for By Frequency-The standards the instructor set for students were....
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Too Low	0	0	0.0%
Appropriate	1	5	71.4%
Too High	2	2	28.6%

Student University-Wide Course Items Applied to All Section Instructors

Results for use by faculty/instructors and students.
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.

By Score

Scale is Strongly Disagree (0) to Strongly Agree (4) with a Neutral mid-point

Table for By Score.
Question	Course
Question	Mean
Course guidelines were clearly described in the syllabus.	3.6
The required texts (e.g. books, course packs, online resources) helped me learn course material.	3.8

By Frequency

1. Course guidelines were clearly described in the syllabus.

Table for By Frequency-1. Course guidelines were clearly described in the syllabus..
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Strongly Disagree	0	0	0.0%
Disagree	1	0	0.0%
Neutral	2	0	0.0%
Agree	3	3	42.9%
Strongly Agree	4	4	57.1%

Table for By Frequency-1. Course guidelines were clearly described in the syllabus.-Statistics.
Statistics	Value
Response Count	7
Mean	3.6
Standard Deviation	0.5

2. The required texts (e.g. books, course packs, online resources) helped me learn course material.

Table for By Frequency-2. The required texts (e.g. books, course packs, online resources) helped me learn course material..
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Strongly Disagree	0	0	0.0%
Disagree	1	0	0.0%
Neutral	2	0	0.0%
Agree	3	1	25.0%
Strongly Agree	4	3	75.0%

Table for By Frequency-2. The required texts (e.g. books, course packs, online resources) helped me learn course material.-Statistics.
Statistics	Value
Response Count	4
Mean	3.8
Standard Deviation	0.5

Based on the quality of my work in this course, the grades I earned were

By Score

Scale is Too Low (0) to Too High (2) with an Appropriate mid-point

Table for By Score.
Question	Course
Question	Mean
Based on the quality of my work in this course, the grades I earned were	1.0

By Frequency

Based on the quality of my work in this course, the grades I earned were

Table for By Frequency-Based on the quality of my work in this course, the grades I earned were.
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Too Low	0	0	0.0%
Appropriate	1	7	100.0%
Too High	2	0	0.0%

Given the course level and number of credits the workload was

By Score

Scale is Too Low (0) to Too High (2) with an Appropriate mid-point

Table for By Score.
Question	Course
Question	Mean
Given the course level and number of credits, the workload was	1.0

By Frequency

Given the course level and number of credits, the workload was

Table for By Frequency-Given the course level and number of credits, the workload was.
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Too Low	0	0	0.0%
Appropriate	1	7	100.0%
Too High	2	0	0.0%

How much effort did you put into the course?

By Score

Scale is Little (0) to Considerable (2) with a Moderate mid-point

Table for By Score.
Question	Course
Question	Mean
How much effort did you put into the course?	1.9

By Frequency

How much effort did you put into the course?

Table for By Frequency-How much effort did you put into the course?.
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Little	0	0	0.0%
Moderate	1	1	14.3%
Considerable	2	6	85.7%

Student University-Wide Instructor James Purtilo Items
Results for use by faculty/instructors and students.
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.

By Score

Scale is Strongly Disagree (0) to Strongly Agree (4) with a Neutral mid-point

Table for By Score.
Question	Course
Question	Mean
The instructor was effective in communicating the content of the course.	1.9
The instructor was responsive to student concerns.	1.9
The instructor helped create an atmosphere that kept me engaged in course content.	1.7

By Frequency

1. The instructor was effective in communicating the content of the course.

Table for By Frequency-1. The instructor was effective in communicating the content of the course..
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Strongly Disagree	0	2	28.6%
Disagree	1	2	28.6%
Neutral	2	0	0.0%
Agree	3	1	14.3%
Strongly Agree	4	2	28.6%

Table for By Frequency-1. The instructor was effective in communicating the content of the course.-Statistics.
Statistics	Value
Response Count	7
Mean	1.9
Standard Deviation	1.8

2. The instructor was responsive to student concerns.

Table for By Frequency-2. The instructor was responsive to student concerns..
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Strongly Disagree	0	2	28.6%
Disagree	1	1	14.3%
Neutral	2	2	28.6%
Agree	3	0	0.0%
Strongly Agree	4	2	28.6%

Table for By Frequency-2. The instructor was responsive to student concerns.-Statistics.
Statistics	Value
Response Count	7
Mean	1.9
Standard Deviation	1.7

3. The instructor helped create an atmosphere that kept me engaged in course content.

Table for By Frequency-3. The instructor helped create an atmosphere that kept me engaged in course content..
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Strongly Disagree	0	2	28.6%
Disagree	1	2	28.6%
Neutral	2	1	14.3%
Agree	3	0	0.0%
Strongly Agree	4	2	28.6%

Table for By Frequency-3. The instructor helped create an atmosphere that kept me engaged in course content.-Statistics.
Statistics	Value
Response Count	7
Mean	1.7
Standard Deviation	1.7

College-Wide Course Items Applied to All Section Instructors - Robert H. Smith School of Business
Results for use by faculty/instructors and for administrative purposes.
N/A responses have been excluded from the following calculations.

Overall this is an excellent course.

By Score

Scale is Strongly Disagree (0) to Strongly Agree (4) with a Neutral mid-point

Table for By Score.
Question	Course
Question	Mean
Overall this is an excellent course.	3.9

By Frequency

Overall this is an excellent course.

Table for By Frequency-Overall this is an excellent course..
Options	Score	Count	Percentage
Strongly Disagree	0	0	0.0%
Disagree	1	0	0.0%
Neutral	2	0	0.0%
Agree	3	1	14.3%
Strongly Agree	4	6	85.7%

Table for By Frequency-Overall this is an excellent course.-Statistics.
Statistics	Value
Response Count	7
Mean	3.9
Standard Deviation	0.4

End of Report